Why some Local Policies Function and others don’t
The essay concentrates on factors in metropolitan contexts that may
influence the capacity of local policies to achieve their objectives.
Considering four main explanatory dimensions in detail. The first
concerns the importance of the characteristics of the context in which
the policies are carried out; the second the specific features of the
type of collective good that is being aimed at; the third the characteristics
of the policy sector of the intervention; while the fourth is
linked to the choices and strategies followed at local level. The analysis
shows that, if we want to study the efficiency of local policies, we
need interpretative tools that can combine the importance of «context» factors with those more linked to individual action, bringing out
how these two dimensions influence each other.
Regional Administrative Management: Characteristics, Conditionings and Contextual Dynamics
This contribution starts from the premise that administrative management
is one of the most important factors in bringing about good administration – in the sense of effective response to the social demands
that local regions are required to satisfy. After a brief reference
to the reference framework of the premise, the essay considers the
factors or variables that may best explain the characteristics that distinguish
and differentiate regional management, asking if these vary as
a result of contingent factors that, as such, may be different from one
case to another, and if they are they connected to systematic variables
in the context. The hypothesis advanced considers some variables of
the socio-economic, cultural and political context in a particular region
as a starting-point for comparing and discussing the data in recent
studies of the management of Campania, Emilia-Romagna and
the Veneto.
«A Generative Dance». The Study of the Health Service in Italy: Management, Professions and Politics
This essay tackles the question of how a series of key figures in the
system of the Italian health service are adapting and responding to the
process of managerialization. In particolar, it focuses on the changes
in the forms and relations of power that concern the new technicalmanagerial
figures of the health service (the Director Generals), the
doctors and the politicians, with the aim of evaluating how much the
hitherto prevailing professional-bureaucratic model in the health
service is actually changing.
Building up Administrative Capacity in Southern Italy
Administrative capacity is an essential dimension of the rule of law.
That is why, if democracy is to improve in quality, whether at national
or local level, it depends on capacity building. Initiatives of
this kind are based on the use of various tools (rules, incentives and
socialization), which determine different levels of impact (introduction
of rules, implementation and internalization). The essay analyses
these processes of capacity building, starting from the study of
three cases.
Mafias and Grey Areas in the Health Service
The Mafia is interested in the health service for many reasons –
money-laundering, treatment for criminals on the run, and social and
political influence. But the health service is tempting to other types of
criminal cartels too – consisting of businessmen, members of the professions,
doctors, managers of the public services and politicians –
with whom the Mafia can cooperate, though not always successfully.
The empirical evidence the article draws on concerns the cases of two
health authorities that have been disbanded as a result of mafia infiltration:
Locri (2005) and Reggio Calabria (2008). Challenging the common
view that the Mafia is able to control all the social relations it
enters into, the conclusion is that the outcome in the health service is
not necessarily predictable, but depends to a great extent on the opportunities
and constraints of each of the categories of participants.
Traduzione dall’italiano